Kevin Wang signing in to kick off the discussion on my Technology Marketing Center case study: How Not to Execute Guerilla Warfare
One of the readings from the course was "Marketing Warfare". It was such a "Wow!" experience that I recommended it to almost all my colleagues to read. Although "fight" is the word we used a lot to talk about winning business opportunities, it was "Marketing Warfare" that made me to realize that sales job is more to win each of the battles while marketing job is actually about the war that is made up of those battles.
And then from there, by using this warfare analogy, I started to see the answers to my questions that I brought up in my last post. For example, all the battles that I had been involved as a salesman were actually part of the war which should be governed by the overall "war strategy" that was setup by marketing people. And a wrong strategy could easily put a battle in a wrong place at a wrong time which would be extremely bloody and even somehow you won the battle by your superior troops but still they simply could not hold it.
One of the most important parts of the strategy is a "Fighting Map" which should be able to tell the sales troops to where to land, where to entrench, where to attack and how to march there. The key point here is: It should not be something "static", it should be "dynamic" which means a brilliant strategy should not just talk about what the target applications are or who the target customers are; a brilliant strategy with a real fighting map should do better job on pointing out a "marching path" to lead the troops from where they landed to where they should advance to.
How to get the "map"? Let's talk about it next time......
Recent Comments